Facebook has the longest-lived and most awkward asset in social media: a cover photo that is a different shape on a phone than on a laptop, with no size that satisfies both.
Every size above is exported by the resizer at the top of this page. The table is generated from the tool’s own preset definitions, so it cannot describe a size the export does not produce.
Designing for Facebook
The cover photo is two different crops
A page cover is displayed wider and shorter on desktop than on mobile, and Facebook derives both from the same upload. There is no single crop that fills each exactly, so the image is cropped on one axis or the other depending on the device.
The reliable approach is to treat the centre as the design and the edges as bleed. Keep type and faces within roughly the middle 60% of the width and the middle 80% of the height, and accept that the outer band exists to be sacrificed.
Group covers use a different, less extreme shape and are less punishing, but the same centre-safe rule applies.
Portrait posts take the most feed space
Facebook's feed allows a taller image than X or LinkedIn, and a portrait post occupies correspondingly more of a phone screen. That is the main lever available for attention here.
The trade is the same as everywhere: taller images are cropped harder anywhere a square thumbnail appears — search results, page previews, shared-link cards. Keep the subject centred.
Stories, and the audience that never sees them
Facebook Stories use the same 9:16 frame as Instagram's, with the same top and bottom interface bands, so a story designed for one works on the other unchanged. That is a genuine saving when publishing to both.
Worth knowing before you invest in them: Facebook's Story surface has a much smaller audience share than Instagram's, and the same asset usually earns more attention there. If you are producing one vertical frame rather than two, produce it for Instagram and cross-post.
The same logic runs through the feed placements. Facebook and Instagram share a publishing and ad system, so an asset built to Instagram's portrait shape works on both without a second export. Building here first and adapting rarely goes the other way as cleanly, because the cover photo has no Instagram equivalent at all.
1080 pixels wide, with the height set by the shape you want: 1350 for the portrait format that occupies the most feed space, 1080 for a square, and 566 for landscape. Stories and Reels are 1080 × 1920. The exact numbers for every format this tool exports are in the reference table above, generated from the presets themselves rather than typed from memory.
What size is a YouTube thumbnail?
1280 × 720, a 16:9 frame. That is YouTube's recommended size and the one this tool exports. Design for it to be legible at roughly 210 pixels wide, which is how big it will actually be in a sidebar — a thumbnail that only works at full size is a thumbnail that does not work.
How do I resize one image for every platform at once?
Select every destination you need, then export. The tool crops your image separately for each target ratio, resizes each crop to that platform's pixel dimensions, and packages the whole set into one ZIP with descriptive filenames. One upload of effort, one download, every size correct.
Will my subject get cut off?
Not usually. Rather than cropping from the centre, the tool looks for a face in the image and falls back to a saliency estimate — the region with the most visual detail — then places the crop window around that point. You can nudge the framing afterwards if it chose differently from you, which matters most for the extreme ratios like a 1500 × 500 header.
Is this free?
Completely. Every step runs in your browser using WebAssembly codecs, so there is no server cost for us to pass on. No sign-up, no watermark, no cap on how many images or how many sizes. The Pro plan adds AI tools and AVIF output; social resizing stays free.
Are my photos uploaded?
No. Decoding, face detection, cropping, resizing and ZIP creation all happen on your device. Nothing is transmitted, nothing is stored on our side and nothing needs deleting afterwards — which is what makes this usable for client work and unreleased campaign material.
Does resizing for social media reduce quality?
Downscaling is the safe direction and this tool uses Lanczos resampling, which preserves detail better than the simpler filters most browsers apply by default. The real risk is starting too small: exporting a 1080-pixel image to a 2560-pixel YouTube banner means enlarging, and enlargement cannot add detail that was never captured. Start from the largest original you have.
What is the safe area, and why do my Stories get covered?
A 1080 × 1920 Story is full-screen, and the platform draws its own interface on top of it: your profile and name across the top, and reply controls, captions and buttons across the bottom. Roughly the top and bottom 250 pixels are contested. Keep text and faces in the middle band and use the outer regions for background, or the app will place a Send button over your headline.
Should I export as JPG, PNG or WebP?
The tool picks a sensible output format from your source, keeping PNG where transparency needs preserving and using a lossy format where it does not. For social specifically the choice matters less than people expect, because every platform re-encodes what you upload anyway. What does matter is uploading at the full recommended dimensions, so the platform's own compression starts from a large, clean image.
Why do platforms keep changing their image sizes?
Because the surfaces change. A new full-screen video format, a redesigned profile page or a different feed layout all move the goalposts, and the recommended dimensions follow. That is exactly why the size table on this page is generated from the presets the tool actually exports rather than written into an article: when a preset is updated, the documentation updates with it instead of quietly becoming wrong.